But when i test my curve compared to mists, mines more predictable. Idk what were doing differently, but with my setup I land noticably closer to the target with my curves than using the default ST during my accuracy tests. And i never said Obs1v isnt smart or anything like that, but since no one has ever come up with my way of creating a 1:1 curve (or at least have done it), then I thought giving my input on it is still good. Sure, maybe he has come up with a way to work arround the acelleration for his ST creation, but with my method the accelleration is 100% gone, and im going to post my thought's because if they have always used circles to make their curves or whatever, then maybe they never thought about trying it my way or incorperating it in. Im not saying my way is perfect, and im also not saying their way is perfect, but if its a new method never taken into consideration before then maybe a combination of the 2 could help with accelleration games, or even maybe just the info would be good. And again, the time you have doing something does not matter, other people sometimes think differently and can catch your mistakes or come up with new ideas.... Just like with medicine in the dark ages compared to now, you could be a doctor in the dark ages for 50 uears and still have worse medicine treatments than a doctor of our time, because some people came up with new ideas and discovered new things. Same thing can be applied here, im not saying hes not smart or anything, all im saying is if theres a new idea that could potentially help then i am not going tl assume they thought about it, otherwise no progress will ever be made.