XIM Community

General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: GreyMouser on 10:20 AM - 05/06/16

Title: Battlefield...1
Post by: GreyMouser on 10:20 AM - 05/06/16
Leaked promo photos
(http://i.imgur.com/AznrUzq.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ChyRtB5U4AU5wDW.jpg:large)

Rumors = WW1 game, possibly via time-travel.

We'll know officially later today

UPDATE: WW1 confirmed. Time travel likely false rumor. Here's the official trailer
http://www.youtube.com/v/c7nRTF2SowQ&hd=1

Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7nRTF2SowQ
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: mist4fun on 10:29 AM - 05/06/16
Cool. It would be a nice change of pace. Air combat going back to propeller planes would be great too.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: GreyMouser on 10:47 AM - 05/06/16
Cool. It would be a nice change of pace. Air combat going back to propeller planes would be great too.

Yeah, def. gambling on trying something different. THIS  (https://www.reddit.com/r/Battlefield/comments/4hdigq/battlefield_2016_detailed_from_my_source_ww1_game/)reddit post by a guy with 'an inside source', turned out to be right about the WW1 setting. There's a yt link within his reddit post with a LOT of details. Includes an Air Superiority game mode with prop planes.

But, we'll know if that guy's source is totally correct after the official reveal at https://www.twitch.tv/battlefield in a few hours.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: Phil Ashio on 11:06 AM - 05/06/16
I was hoping it would have been 2143. While I would like for COD to go back to any era from WW1 to Cold War I don't think I could handle it in BF anymore. On the plus side it could mean a less bloated game with less gadgets that throw the balance off. On the other hand they would have to be pretty small maps to make the slow vehicle gameplay not boring.

BF would benefit a lot from faster transportation and means of getting back into battle which a 2143 setting would provide. Pod dropping from titans to fight over silos and then raiding the enemy titan is still one of the most fun things I've done in gaming.

I'm still hoping that there's more to be revealed. Something like BF1 is a smaller digital one off like 1943 was and there's another game coming.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: mist4fun on 11:25 AM - 05/06/16
Thanks GreyMouser, I'll watch twitter for it.

I missed 2142 but from what I hear people either loved it or hated it. Did you play the Nam expansion pack for BC2? It was as good if not better than BC2, I had a blast with it. Current warfare doesn't interest me anymore and future warfare never did. If done right this could bring me back to BF.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: Web-head on 11:52 AM - 05/06/16
This can't be real... I might have to actually skip a Battlefield (Hardline doesn't count)...
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: GreyMouser on 02:14 PM - 05/06/16
WW1 confirmed!

EDIT: trailer has end-tag "play 1st on xbox one w/ EA access"

Also, as the reddit-leaker said, it does appear to be DICE-Sweden.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: Web-head on 02:17 PM - 05/06/16
RIP Battlefield
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: Bertuzzi1616 on 02:18 PM - 05/06/16
Looks pretty awesome
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: Cybie on 02:19 PM - 05/06/16
A WW1 setting is either going to make or break this franchise.

For me, I would love to play in this era. Expect a lot of streams.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: Od1n on 02:21 PM - 05/06/16
good change as it was more than necessary, modern setting slowly feels overused
the trailer looks interesting, though actual gameplay would be needed to better judge on it


another 2142 and i wouldve skipped, but this really is refreshing
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: asilver on 02:26 PM - 05/06/16
looks awesome, can't wait to use old weapons in a new game.

ww1 weapons - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_infantry_weapons_of_World_War_I

Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: GreyMouser on 02:30 PM - 05/06/16
Updated OP with official trailer
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: MrSir on 02:49 PM - 05/06/16
dumb name but it looks sick. way better than infinite warfare
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: Phil Ashio on 02:51 PM - 05/06/16
Thanks GreyMouser, I'll watch twitter for it.

I missed 2142 but from what I hear people either loved it or hated it. Did you play the Nam expansion pack for BC2? It was as good if not better than BC2, I had a blast with it. Current warfare doesn't interest me anymore and future warfare never did. If done right this could bring me back to BF.

It's understandable that not everybody warmed up to it. 2142 had some of the worst technical issues outside of BF4. Shooting at titan windshield made the game unplayably laggy and I don't remember that ever getting fixed. Helicopters were noobified to the point of not being fun and mostly useless. Some of the physics felt a bit off. The tech wasn't there to handle the art direction so it actually looked worse than BF2. There was more of a focus on infantry and bottlenecks but there was too many ways to get cheap kills like turrets, claymores, and frag spam. However, all of that stuff could have been fixed up and Frostbyte 3 would have made the game amazing. Unfortunately, Dice missed the boat thanks to COD and Titanfall doing future warfare and not doing it particularly well.

I'll give BF1 a chance if there's a beta. If it turns out well I'll probably get it. My initial reaction to the WW1 setting is disappointment. Especially with all the teasing of 2143 they ended up doing WW1. I liked their futuristic vision and art design. And the titan gameplay was something different. Right now, though, I'm not excited for either COD or BF.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: Web-head on 03:03 PM - 05/06/16
Weapon selection will make this extremely hard to buy for me.  Main reason I didn't want a WWI game.  FML
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: Phil Ashio on 03:21 PM - 05/06/16
Yeah, looking at that weapons list actually gave me a bigger soft on than before.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: Web-head on 03:23 PM - 05/06/16
What do you mean?  You don't want 20 versions of the same bolt action rifle with no scopes???
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: Od1n on 03:42 PM - 05/06/16
What do you mean?  You don't want 20 versions of the same bolt action rifle with no scopes???

what makes you think they stick to histocial accuracy?
no BF game really did that so far
that zepelin gunship, that machine gun, the trailer showed so much stuff that hints not towards boltaction
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: Phantom Machine on 05:11 PM - 05/06/16
I'm sure they'll be putting gameplay first and historical accuracy second. There will still be assault rifle type weapons and lots of optics. They know better than to completely strip down the game.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: DIRTYxWHITExBOY on 06:21 PM - 05/06/16
Finally, it's about time.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: RML on 07:02 PM - 05/06/16
WOW!! Game looks to be amazing. Definitely need the change of pace. It's like they are rivaling MW remaster instead of Infinite lol ... smart move IMO.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: Amuro on 01:42 AM - 05/07/16
Pre-ordered it on PSN.  Am I crazy?
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: Lord Of The Sith on 05:07 AM - 05/07/16
WOW!! Game looks to be amazing. Definitely need the change of pace. It's like they are rivaling MW remaster instead of Infinite lol ... smart move IMO.

Looks awesome, really cant wait to see the beta tbh.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: amak1 on 06:59 PM - 05/07/16
Im psyched but i still feel burned on battlefront, played that game for a week. So im not getting my hopes up. Trailer was amazing though.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: RML on 10:57 AM - 05/08/16
Im psyched but i still feel burned on battlefront, played that game for a week. So im not getting my hopes up. Trailer was amazing though.

I'm a pretty big Battlefield fan and I only played Battlefront a few times myself. Something about it just felt off, it just couldn't keep me engaged more then an hour or two at a time. I went back and played some BF4 yesterday and really enjoyed it, even enjoyed some Hardline as compared to Battlefront. The game just didn't reside with me well either.

I'm fairly confident BF1 will appeal to me a lot more then Battlefront did though. I'm actually excited about a BF campaign for the first time in quite a while. I love history and really look forward to the WWI setting.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: Lord Of The Sith on 12:30 PM - 05/08/16
I'm fairly confident BF1 will appeal to me a lot more then Battlefront did though. I'm actually excited about a BF campaign for the first time in quite a while. I love history and really look forward to the WWI setting.

My sentiments exactly! I really want to play a gritty ww2 SP campaign that looks amazing. I can see this could be just as good if not better with the 'focus' Bayonet charges and bludgeoning, the bolt action snipers / rifles and hopefully a mission or two in the biplane's..
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: amak1 on 04:57 AM - 05/09/16
We will see boys, im a huge bf fan aswell.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: Amuro on 07:58 AM - 05/09/16
I was huge into BF2, BF3, BF4..and the controls of BF3 and BF4 felt great and smooth.  Gunplay was fantastic and skillful.

In my opinion, I feel like DICE messed up the gunplay and feel of hardline...it felt cheapened..stiff, non-responsive, etc...

That feel was pushed even further in battlefront...where it felt just straight arcade shootery and overall crap controls.

I will wait to play the beta before making any purchase of a future DICE game.  I'm hoping they return to form, and cut out this casual catering of simplistic feeling shooting mechanics and controls.
I thought Hardline had been developed Visceral not DICE.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: Web-head on 08:41 AM - 05/09/16
What do you mean?  You don't want 20 versions of the same bolt action rifle with no scopes???

what makes you think they stick to histocial accuracy?
no BF game really did that so far
that zepelin gunship, that machine gun, the trailer showed so much stuff that hints not towards boltaction

Are you honestly telling me you expect modern weapons in this game?  What's the point of doing WWI then?
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: Web-head on 08:42 AM - 05/09/16
Pre-ordered it on PSN.  Am I crazy?

Preordered on PSN? Yes, crazy.  Preordered on Amazon? No, not crazy.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: attila4go on 10:24 AM - 05/09/16
(http://i.imgur.com/LJSr1e5.jpg)
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: attila4go on 10:28 AM - 05/09/16
It will be interesting vehicles. :D

(http://www.warlordgames.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/07_zpscf1e7b03-600x400.jpg)
(http://i1169.photobucket.com/albums/r506/Obant01/Great%20War%20Group%20Build/Tauro%20German%20A7V%20WW1%20Tank/A7V-diagram_zps817033c8.jpg)
(http://www.crossley-motors.org.uk/history/military/IGA1/IGA1_UK.jpg)
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: asilver on 10:33 AM - 05/09/16
Pre-ordered it on PSN.  Am I crazy?

Preordered on PSN? Yes, crazy.  Preordered on Amazon? No, not crazy.

BF games are awful on console compared to PC, pretty much just bc xim doesn't work well with vehicles. You might be able to keep a plane in the air, but good luck getting any kills. I've owned both versions since bfbc2, I always have a better time on PC, mainly bc the mouse always feels normal throughout the entire game. While on console you have to fight the vehicle turn speed. Turning a tank around with the xim takes like half an hour...

I can see why most of you play cod bc that's the only game that truly works well with xim, but if you aren't using vehicles in bf, you might as well stick with cod.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: mist4fun on 10:51 AM - 05/09/16
It used to be bad but has been great since the vehicle update. I believe vehicle turn speed nearly matches player turn speed in BF4 now. Although I never tested air vehicles.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: Web-head on 10:57 AM - 05/09/16
Pre-ordered it on PSN.  Am I crazy?

Preordered on PSN? Yes, crazy.  Preordered on Amazon? No, not crazy.

BF games are awful on console compared to PC, pretty much just bc xim doesn't work well with vehicles. You might be able to keep a plane in the air, but good luck getting any kills. I've owned both versions since bfbc2, I always have a better time on PC, mainly bc the mouse always feels normal throughout the entire game. While on console you have to fight the vehicle turn speed. Turning a tank around with the xim takes like half an hour...

I can see why most of you play cod bc that's the only game that truly works well with xim, but if you aren't using vehicles in bf, you might as well stick with cod.

I'm not really a big vehicle guy.  I do well with tanks using a Vehicle config though, which just ups my sens by like 5 times when I activate it.  I like infantry more though.  Particularly aggressive sniping. 

I was a Tank whore in BFBC2 and early parts of BF3, so I got a lot of it out of my system I guess.  Helis were hard to get since there was no practice mode back then, and I didn't feel right trying to learn in game, when you would kill 3 or 4 other people if you couldn't fly, so I'm just now using them, and still don't use them much.

I have had BF3 and BF4 on both console and PC.  I can say that I prefer them on console much more.  They look great and perform great on PC, but the official servers are gone like a month after the game drops on PC and you're stuck with all custom servers with crazy rules, player counts that don't fit the mode/map, etc.  It becomes nearly impossible to find a game that is normal, as in uses the entire map rotation and not just 1 or 2 maps the community likes best, and so on.  24/7 Nosharh Canals and such...

If I get Battlefield 5, it will only be on PS4 or Neo.  Not doing the PC thing again.  Learned my lesson.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: Od1n on 10:59 AM - 05/09/16
What do you mean?  You don't want 20 versions of the same bolt action rifle with no scopes???

what makes you think they stick to histocial accuracy?
no BF game really did that so far
that zepelin gunship, that machine gun, the trailer showed so much stuff that hints not towards boltaction

Are you honestly telling me you expect modern weapons in this game?  What's the point of doing WWI then?

no but you saw a big machine gun with pretty fast firerate in the video, thats what im saying
also the DICE guy during the interview hinted that theyll implement some stuff that doesnt fully match the time period to come up with customizations of weapons and such
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: Web-head on 11:04 AM - 05/09/16
What do you mean?  You don't want 20 versions of the same bolt action rifle with no scopes???

what makes you think they stick to histocial accuracy?
no BF game really did that so far
that zepelin gunship, that machine gun, the trailer showed so much stuff that hints not towards boltaction

Are you honestly telling me you expect modern weapons in this game?  What's the point of doing WWI then?

no but you saw a big machine gun with pretty fast firerate in the video, thats what im saying
also the DICE guy during the interview hinted that theyll implement some stuff that doesnt fully match the time period to come up with customizations of weapons and such

I'll give the game a chance.  I'll definitely play the hell out of the beta.  I'm just saying that WWI setting will obviously hurt weapon selection greatly if they go authentic, and even if they add "some" out of era stuff to spice it up, it will be better, but still very limited.  At least to me.

I'm happy that many are hyped, but it's just not all that interesting a time period in terms of weapons IMO.  People are happy they are doing something different, but different, doesn't necessarily equal interesting.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: RML on 11:45 AM - 05/09/16
What do you mean?  You don't want 20 versions of the same bolt action rifle with no scopes???

what makes you think they stick to histocial accuracy?
no BF game really did that so far
that zepelin gunship, that machine gun, the trailer showed so much stuff that hints not towards boltaction

Are you honestly telling me you expect modern weapons in this game?  What's the point of doing WWI then?

no but you saw a big machine gun with pretty fast firerate in the video, thats what im saying
also the DICE guy during the interview hinted that theyll implement some stuff that doesnt fully match the time period to come up with customizations of weapons and such

I'll give the game a chance.  I'll definitely play the hell out of the beta.  I'm just saying that WWI setting will obviously hurt weapon selection greatly if they go authentic, and even if they add "some" out of era stuff to spice it up, it will be better, but still very limited.  At least to me.

I'm happy that many are hyped, but it's just not all that interesting a time period in terms of weapons IMO.  People are happy they are doing something different, but different, doesn't necessarily equal interesting.


Personally, I'd rather only have 5-6 different guns to chose from. It puts more emphasis on skill. It's a better trade off then having 20 different guns that are constantly getting overhauled anyways. Vespers great ... Update ... Vesper sucks, picks different gun works great till the next update, picks different gun.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: Web-head on 11:49 AM - 05/09/16
I'm not one to only use the best weapons in a game, so I like variety.  I use all weapons in Destiny, not just meta.  My fave weapon is No Land Beyond, which is arguably the worst weapon in the entire game, so...
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: asilver on 12:41 PM - 05/09/16
It used to be bad but has been great since the vehicle update. I believe vehicle turn speed nearly matches player turn speed in BF4 now. Although I never tested air vehicles.

I could fly well with xim for movement alone but on PC (helicopters) I can stay accurate at ridiculous ranges. I practiced for hours on console in empty servers, couldn't actually get kills or evade in game, but I could at least control the helicopter somewhat. Then on pc, I can easily keep the attack helicopter overtop any road with all the turns on any map, which requires you taking the attack helicopter parallel to the ground (completely sideways) while in 90 degree turns. Takes a little practice but anyone who's ever played a racing game could probably pull this off with a hour or two of practice. More importantly, I can consistently win chopper fights with rockets alone - which is obviously the most crucial part of it all. If anyone can do this with xim (with any curve or st) I would seriously be impressed. This is just because it feels WEIRD, pointing the choppers reticle at anything, moving or stationary, always felt off to me. But on PC I can pinpoint my shots, which is necessary for chopper v chopper fights, shooting infantry or moving targets, etc. I put out 3 rockets and they're dead. On console I'm lucky to get a hit marker.

Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: attila4go on 01:53 PM - 05/10/16
Server browser confirmed. https://twitter.com/Battlefield/status/730058288411324416 (https://twitter.com/Battlefield/status/730058288411324416)
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: Amuro on 11:11 PM - 05/11/16
Pre-ordered it on PSN.  Am I crazy?
Preordered on PSN? Yes, crazy.  Preordered on Amazon? No, not crazy.

BF games are awful on console compared to PC, pretty much just bc xim doesn't work well with vehicles. You might be able to keep a plane in the air, but good luck getting any kills. I've owned both versions since bfbc2, I always have a better time on PC, mainly bc the mouse always feels normal throughout the entire game. While on console you have to fight the vehicle turn speed. Turning a tank around with the xim takes like half an hour...

I can see why most of you play cod bc that's the only game that truly works well with xim, but if you aren't using vehicles in bf, you might as well stick with cod.

I'm not really a big vehicle guy.  I do well with tanks using a Vehicle config though, which just ups my sens by like 5 times when I activate it.  I like infantry more though.  Particularly aggressive sniping. 

I was a Tank whore in BFBC2 and early parts of BF3, so I got a lot of it out of my system I guess.  Helis were hard to get since there was no practice mode back then, and I didn't feel right trying to learn in game, when you would kill 3 or 4 other people if you couldn't fly, so I'm just now using them, and still don't use them much.

I have had BF3 and BF4 on both console and PC.  I can say that I prefer them on console much more.  They look great and perform great on PC, but the official servers are gone like a month after the game drops on PC and you're stuck with all custom servers with crazy rules, player counts that don't fit the mode/map, etc.  It becomes nearly impossible to find a game that is normal, as in uses the entire map rotation and not just 1 or 2 maps the community likes best, and so on.  24/7 Nosharh Canals and such...

If I get Battlefield 5, it will only be on PS4 or Neo.  Not doing the PC thing again.  Learned my lesson.
Yeah, and BF4 now have vehicle turret sensitivity in settings, which makes XIM a lot better for vehicles.  BF 1 hopefully will have the same. 

PC is great but the cheating is ridiculous.  One cheater on the server can ruin the entire match.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: asilver on 11:29 AM - 05/12/16
Makes it a lot better, or a little better? Which vehicles? I'm specifically talking about air vehicles with xim.

Flying will be a huge part of Bf1, would be nice to see something close to PC like control for planes and helicopters. I'm not tinkering with settings and dead zones when there is a universal setting on PC. Which takes me to keybinding, there are like 200 things you can customize on Bf, compared to console you're stuck with only one duplicate key. Then on cod you just fire it right up and... ready to go within like 2 minutes.

Hackers aren't so bad on new fps games, which pretty much covers that topic for me... if you want to play something from 2005, maybe so.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: Od1n on 05:56 PM - 05/12/16
with the increased vehicle speed all ground vehicles + helis are perfect
i dont know about jets, but imo they shouldnt belong into the game in the first place
one of the reasons why BC2 and its DLC is the best BF, no stupidly overpowered air vehicles
a skilled jet pilot can only be killed by another skilled jet pilot in the other team, theres no other vehicle or calss that this stupid mechanic applies to
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: mist4fun on 06:32 PM - 05/12/16
I think jets are still a problem.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: tails72 on 04:29 AM - 05/13/16
It will be worst in battlefield one if they keep the same mechanics as BF4 , because at least in BF4 if you have a dominant jet pilot you can sort of keep him at bay with the MAA and lock ons, in bf1 there will be none of that to help you so if the biplane pilot is good then there will be no stopping him
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: mist4fun on 09:36 AM - 05/13/16
They will be slow moving biplanes. You should be able to damage them with primary weapons, AA, and other aircraft. With any luck it will be like 1942.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: asilver on 12:27 PM - 05/13/16
with the increased vehicle speed all ground vehicles + helis are perfect
i dont know about jets, but imo they shouldnt belong into the game in the first place
one of the reasons why BC2 and its DLC is the best BF, no stupidly overpowered air vehicles
a skilled jet pilot can only be killed by another skilled jet pilot in the other team, theres no other vehicle or calss that this stupid mechanic applies to

They aren't op at all, maybe in bf3 but each jet has its weakness in BF4. The attack jet is good for air to ground, but kinda sucks air to air, opposite with the stealth jet which is great for taking out other jets and helicopters, because of this they make it really easy to take out a good pilot. Unless there are two very skilled pilots working together as wingmen, then there will def be some challenge to it, but that's how Bf is. Also jet superiority gives a leg up on getting a feel for air to air.

Not to mention you're asking for it when you take on a tank with a jet, probably the most risky ground target other than AA. The little bird eats jets for breakfast with the mini guns. Then you have lock ons, TV missiles, smaw and RPG, 20 more little nicknakcs etc.

Keep in mind this is PC I'm talking about, and tracking your mouse or just aiming in general (with vehicles) always  feels right. TV missiles vs a jet head on = easy. Because you don't have to fight the look mechanic or mess with curves and separate sensitivities.

Planes are going to be fragile in bf1 and more vulnerable, it's probably going to be a one shot kill with that anti tank rifle, if not 75+ damage to the focker and other small aircraft.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: mist4fun on 02:16 PM - 05/13/16
Planes are going to be fragile in bf1 and more vulnerable, it's probably going to be a one shot kill with that anti tank rifle, if not 75+ damage to the focker and other small aircraft.

And it will be glorious. I prefer 1942/Nam/BC2 model over BF3/BF4 jets.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: Od1n on 10:53 AM - 05/14/16
server browser has been confirmed by the way, if only more games would do that
matchmaking for the lazy and serverbrowser + rental for those that want to play the map and mode they want
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: Amuro on 11:50 PM - 05/14/16
Makes it a lot better, or a little better? Which vehicles? I'm specifically talking about air vehicles with xim.

Flying will be a huge part of Bf1, would be nice to see something close to PC like control for planes and helicopters. I'm not tinkering with settings and dead zones when there is a universal setting on PC. Which takes me to keybinding, there are like 200 things you can customize on Bf, compared to console you're stuck with only one duplicate key. Then on cod you just fire it right up and... ready to go within like 2 minutes.

Hackers aren't so bad on new fps games, which pretty much covers that topic for me... if you want to play something from 2005, maybe so.
Flying is fine for me.  I mapped pitch up and down to keys just like it on PC; I can also put roll on keyboard and yaw on mouse, which is something you can't do on PC.  I've played both BF3 and BF4 on PC as well and there are jet aimbots with speed handler that keeps your speed at 313 or whatever you set and increased damage so you can one-shot people on the ground with your jet.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dyhuDgQk4HQ

You will be looking at a full blown bi-plane aimbot for BF1 within a week of release for sure, and not to mention all the ground aimbots from other sites.  Like said, cheating is ridiculous on PC.  There's a Cheat Industry out there. The more popular the game the more cheaters you get.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: Zombieguy on 05:26 PM - 05/16/16
This game looks so good but watch how bad it looks and funny it becomes when you add Icons...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4hGAFpQTs4

Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: asilver on 09:28 AM - 05/17/16
Makes it a lot better, or a little better? Which vehicles? I'm specifically talking about air vehicles with xim.

Flying will be a huge part of Bf1, would be nice to see something close to PC like control for planes and helicopters. I'm not tinkering with settings and dead zones when there is a universal setting on PC. Which takes me to keybinding, there are like 200 things you can customize on Bf, compared to console you're stuck with only one duplicate key. Then on cod you just fire it right up and... ready to go within like 2 minutes.

Hackers aren't so bad on new fps games, which pretty much covers that topic for me... if you want to play something from 2005, maybe so.
Flying is fine for me.  I mapped pitch up and down to keys just like it on PC; I can also put roll on keyboard and yaw on mouse, which is something you can't do on PC.  I've played both BF3 and BF4 on PC as well and there are jet aimbots with speed handler that keeps your speed at 313 or whatever you set and increased damage so you can one-shot people on the ground with your jet.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dyhuDgQk4HQ

You will be looking at a full blown bi-plane aimbot for BF1 within a week of release for sure, and not to mention all the ground aimbots from other sites.  Like said, cheating is ridiculous on PC.  There's a Cheat Industry out there. The more popular the game the more cheaters you get.

You can make those binds on PC.

Obviously there are hackers on PC games, my point is I see like 5 or 10 blatant hackers a year (specifically on BF) at that rate its hard to be annoyed. I don't regularly see them on games that are notorious for hackers, but then again I don't play the division. All I really play are MP fps games, more often than not someone is just calling hacks. Everyone does it. The real giveaway is when you see the chat light up with hacker hacker hacker - from everyone, and even that could just be a highly skilled player.

Do you have any video of you flying jets with xim?
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: Amuro on 03:40 AM - 05/18/16
Makes it a lot better, or a little better? Which vehicles? I'm specifically talking about air vehicles with xim.

Flying will be a huge part of Bf1, would be nice to see something close to PC like control for planes and helicopters. I'm not tinkering with settings and dead zones when there is a universal setting on PC. Which takes me to keybinding, there are like 200 things you can customize on Bf, compared to console you're stuck with only one duplicate key. Then on cod you just fire it right up and... ready to go within like 2 minutes.

Hackers aren't so bad on new fps games, which pretty much covers that topic for me... if you want to play something from 2005, maybe so.
Flying is fine for me.  I mapped pitch up and down to keys just like it on PC; I can also put roll on keyboard and yaw on mouse, which is something you can't do on PC.  I've played both BF3 and BF4 on PC as well and there are jet aimbots with speed handler that keeps your speed at 313 or whatever you set and increased damage so you can one-shot people on the ground with your jet.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dyhuDgQk4HQ

You will be looking at a full blown bi-plane aimbot for BF1 within a week of release for sure, and not to mention all the ground aimbots from other sites.  Like said, cheating is ridiculous on PC.  There's a Cheat Industry out there. The more popular the game the more cheaters you get.

You can make those binds on PC.

Obviously there are hackers on PC games, my point is I see like 5 or 10 blatant hackers a year (specifically on BF) at that rate its hard to be annoyed. I don't regularly see them on games that are notorious for hackers, but then again I don't play the division. All I really play are MP fps games, more often than not someone is just calling hacks. Everyone does it. The real giveaway is when you see the chat light up with hacker hacker hacker - from everyone, and even that could just be a highly skilled player.

Do you have any video of you flying jets with xim?
There are a lot more people cheating discretely than blatantly.  Cheating is what got me moved to console for multiplayer in the first place.  No, I'm not into making videos.   But I can tell you I mapped pitch up to right mouse button, some people put it on space bar.  This helps a lot.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: asilver on 12:37 PM - 05/19/16
Record some just for science, I don't think there is any footage of someone owning in a jet while using a xim. if there is please link, I would like to see the unpegged movements made with the mouse alone, anyone can fly in general with pitch up on space bar, but is it accurate enough to "draw a straight line" at long range jet to jet engagements when using the mouse alone? And fast enough (mouse movement alone) to keep up with another jet in a tight close range turn? I need to see video of this to believe it is.

If a hacker sneaks a kill on me I don't care, not like I'm going to jump ship to console over a few random deaths. Plus it's really obvious in Bf when someone is hacking, for head to back (or side) engagements a hacker will have no reaction time after turning, they just insta-kill you - imo it's safe to call them a hacker at this point, but then that could just be a moment where the dudes muscle memory / focus / soundwhoring was so on point that there was no need to correct any under or overshooting on the turn - aka "inhuman reactions", any good player can make ridiculous shots from time to time. It's natural to think "they were hacking" when this happens.

Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: Od1n on 02:52 PM - 05/19/16
yes there is, look up forum user "ArmouredNZ" hes one of the best jet pilots on the console and is using a xim
there are also gameplays available as far as i know

here one of the topics he responded in, maybe you have to look through his posts to find the topics and videos you are searching for

http://xim4.com/community/index.php?topic=32531.msg419728#msg419728
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: asilver on 04:50 PM - 05/19/16
Here is one of his videos https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPU2Bby1IFo&feature=youtu.be

Watch around 1:50-2:00, that's the kind of sloppy control I'm talking about. I know there is server lag right there, but he's doing the same thing throughout. If you look closely you can tell he's fighting the turn speed and struggling to keep it straight mostly when he has to pull back down, basically when the target starts dodging movements, he has trouble following. He's a good pilot, obviously, but imo this doesn't pass the "draw a straight line" test. Either way, I am impressed he's this accurate with jets using xim.

Here's one of mine from 2 years ago https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xv2r1Q5-iHk

hitting shots with like this on pc (2:28  / 3:57) - HAS to be much less frustrating, and this with the attack jet which is slightly tougher to control, but to be fair, we were both playing bad players and had no challenging enemy pilots, so all TTK and gameplay comparisons aside, I have to say my movement looks more deliberate and smooth.
Title: Battlefield 1
Post by: Richardsa on 11:47 AM - 05/20/16
> Epic quickscope gameplay
> Battlefield 3

 _ 

Though they have put up Caspian Border servers now. Also, I shall be adding you to my small list of friends.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: Luffy01 on 04:15 PM - 11/16/16
Makes it a lot better, or a little better? Which vehicles? I'm specifically talking about air vehicles with xim.

Flying will be a huge part of Bf1, would be nice to see something close to PC like control for planes and helicopters. I'm not tinkering with settings and dead zones when there is a universal setting on PC. Which takes me to keybinding, there are like 200 things you can customize on Bf, compared to console you're stuck with only one duplicate key. Then on cod you just fire it right up and... ready to go within like 2 minutes.

Hackers aren't so bad on new fps games, which pretty much covers that topic for me... if you want to play something from 2005, maybe so.
Flying is fine for me.  I mapped pitch up and down to keys just like it on PC; I can also put roll on keyboard and yaw on mouse, which is something you can't do on PC.  I've played both BF3 and BF4 on PC as well and there are jet aimbots with speed handler that keeps your speed at 313 or whatever you set and increased damage so you can one-shot people on the ground with your jet.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dyhuDgQk4HQ

You will be looking at a full blown bi-plane aimbot for BF1 within a week of release for sure, and not to mention all the ground aimbots from other sites.  Like said, cheating is ridiculous on PC.  There's a Cheat Industry out there. The more popular the game the more cheaters you get.

Is there any chance you could link your planes setup with keybindings and mouse yaw. I've been trying to figure out to bind my left and right yaw to the mouse.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: Lord Of The Sith on 12:56 PM - 11/17/16
Record some just for science, I don't think there is any footage of someone owning in a jet while using a xim. if there is please link, I would like to see the unpegged movements made with the mouse alone, anyone can fly in general with pitch up on space bar, but is it accurate enough to "draw a straight line" at long range jet to jet engagements when using the mouse alone? And fast enough (mouse movement alone) to keep up with another jet in a tight close range turn? I need to see video of this to believe it is.

If a hacker sneaks a kill on me I don't care, not like I'm going to jump ship to console over a few random deaths. Plus it's really obvious in Bf when someone is hacking, for head to back (or side) engagements a hacker will have no reaction time after turning, they just insta-kill you - imo it's safe to call them a hacker at this point, but then that could just be a moment where the dudes muscle memory / focus / soundwhoring was so on point that there was no need to correct any under or overshooting on the turn - aka "inhuman reactions", any good player can make ridiculous shots from time to time. It's natural to think "they were hacking" when this happens.



This extends to all PC games imho. Well said. - The stuff about jets xD.
Title: Re: Battlefield...1
Post by: OvC4LiFe on 10:35 PM - 11/18/16
anyone play? add me on PSN